The Employment Ordinance, Cap. 57
Employment Protection
Content
What protection an employee will be accorded with under the Part on Employment Protection of the Employment Ordinance? |
||
A1.
|
The Part on Employment Protection of the Employment Ordinance aims at discouraging employers
from dismissing or varying the terms of the employment contract of their employees in order to evade
their liabilities under the Ordinance. An employee may claim for remedies against an
employer under situations of ‘unreasonable dismissal’, ‘unreasonable variation of the
terms of the employment contract’ and ‘unreasonable and unlawful dismissal’ as
specified by the Ordinance.
|
Under what circumstances can an employee make the following claim for remedies against an employer? What are the remedies? (I)
unreasonable dismissal (II)
unreasonable and unlawful dismissal
|
Claim for unreasonable dismissal —
|
|
Claim for unreasonable and unlawful dismissal — An employee may make a claim for remedies against an employer for unreasonable and unlawful dismissal if –
Under such circumstances, the Labour Tribunal, in considering the case, may order –
* Where an employee has been unreasonably and unlawfully dismissed before 19 October 2018, an order for reinstatement or re-engagement will only be made if both the employer and the employee agree to it.
|
Under what circumstances can an employee make a claim for remedies against an employer for unreasonable variation of the terms of the employment contract? What are the remedies? |
An employee employed under a continuous contract may claim for remedies against an employer for unreasonable variation of the terms of the employment contract if –
Under such circumstances, the Labour Tribunal, in considering the case, may order -
|
What are the valid reasons for dismissal or variation of the terms of the employment contract under the Employment Ordinance? |
A4.
|
Under the Employment Ordinance, the five valid reasons for dismissal or variation of the terms of the employment contract are:
The absence from work of an employee by reason of his/her compliance with a specific anti-epidemic requirement with a movement restriction does not constitute a valid reason for a dismissal or a variation of the terms of an employee’s employment contract by his/her employer (please click here to A1 of “Sick Leave” of the Frequently Asked Questions for details on the specific anti-epidemic requirements with a movement restriction).
|
Under what circumstances does a dismissal contravene the law? |
A5.
|
Under the Employment Ordinance, dismissal in the following circumstances contravenes the law:
|
Will the Labour Tribunal secure the employer’s agreement before making a reinstatement or re-engagement order? |
A6.
|
For unreasonable dismissal and unreasonable variation of the terms of the employment contract, an order for reinstatement or re-engagement will only be made if both the employer and the employee agree to it. For unreasonable and unlawful dismissal, if the Labour Tribunal considers the order is appropriate and reinstatement or re-engagement of the employee by the employer is reasonably practicable, such order can be made without the need to secure the employer’s agreement*. * Where an employee has been unreasonably and unlawfully dismissed before 19 October 2018, an order for reinstatement or re-engagement will only be made if both the employer and the employee agree to it.
|
What are terminal payments? | |
A7.
|
Terminal payments includes:
|
The Employment (Amendment) (No.2) Ordinance 2018 came into operation on 19 October 2018. Where an employee has been unreasonably and unlawfully dismissed on or after 19 October 2018 and the employee makes a claim for reinstatement or re-engagement, the Labour Tribunal may make an order for reinstatement or re-engagement without the need to secure the employer’s agreement if the Tribunal considers that the making of such an order is appropriate and practicable. If the employer eventually does not reinstate or re-engage the employee as required by the order, the employer shall pay to the employee a further sum, amounting to three times the employee’s average monthly wages and subject to a ceiling of $72,500. The employer commits an offence if he/she wilfully and without reasonable excuse fails to pay the further sum. For further information, please click here.